Drafting and Revision

Drafting

In the movie "Finding Forrester," a writer's movie, a character says that the first draft should be written with the heart and the second with the head.  For most people, it's not very helpful to sit down and write without any idea what I'm doing.

There are different styles of drafting.  I'm what's often referred to as a "pantser."  I fly by the seat of my pants.  I just need my characters and an inkling of where the plot is going, and I just start writing.  With my romance novels, I don't even write chronologically, whereas with my children's fantasy, I do.  Either way, I don't plan much before I write.  Meanwhile, some people need an elaborate outline and all details planned before they would dream of writing.  These are often called planners. As for me, if I tried to plan everything in detail, I'd never get anywhere.  Outlines just don't work for me.  I need a rough idea where I'm going and a clear view of my characters then I just write.

Regardless of the way one writes, this advice from "Finding Forrester" can be a guide.  When one writes the first draft without spending a lot of time editing, revising, or rethinking everything, more progress is likely to be made.  Those who get bogged down with the details and with rewriting everything over and over again, researching every twist and turn, and belaboring every detail will likely get nowhere in their writing.  There are things that need to be researched in advance, but most things can wait.  The way I understand how the writers of the "Star Trek" series did it, they'd type along and write [tech] anytime they got to a piece of story that needed technology, then they or someone else would go back in and research the technology needed.  A writer can use this method by writing along according to outline or general idea then write [MORE ABOUT THIS] or some such then go in to fill in whatever is missing later.  It's really best if an author uses the momentum built and finishes that draft before ever letting the internal editor or researcher have a chance to walk through the door.

Revision

The next step after the heart/rough draft is written is to revise.  But if one revises right away, when everything is fresh, every cut hurts.  It all feels too personal.  To write the first draft, the author has poured out his/her heart and soul onto the page.  The characters, sometimes even the minor ones, are his or her babies.  He/she has spent HOURS on short scenes that feel important or at least special somehow.

After the draft has lain fallow for as long as the writer can manage, it is time to return and see it with fresher eyes.  It is time to figure out which scenes advance character and/or plot and which ones are just fluff.  It is time to take an axe to those scenes that are precious [overwritten] but not important.  With a bit of distance, one can also achieve a bit more distance as well as impartiality.  I wrote a short story during my undergraduate years, over a decade ago, about which I felt particularly proud.  I recently reviewed it and realized so much of it was inessential.  It went from around 3000 words to about half that.  It is so much better for the cuta I once didn't think needed to happen.  Reading aloud always helps as well.  It slows down the eye and helps the writer catch errors that otherwise would be missed. It's always best as well if the author can find several pair of external eyes to look over the manuscript and give feedback.  Polishing takes as much distance, chronologically as well as emotionally, as one can muster.

In other words, throw yourself into draft one.  Let it carry you either through your outline or in crazy directions if you're a pantser.  But then let Mr. Editor/Researcher/Detail-oriented in and turn it into something a publisher could accept and a reader could enjoy.  Best of luck.